"There
is no such thing as conversation. It is an illusion. There
are intersecting monologues. That is all."
— Rebecca
West
From
Thorstein Veblen's
The
Theory of the Leisure Class
Chapter
Six:
Pecuniary Canons
of Taste
Everyday
life affords many curious illustrations of the way in which
the code of pecuniary beauty in articles of use varies
from class to class, as well as of the way in which the
conventional sense of beauty departs in its deliverances
from the sense untutored by the requirements of pecuniary
repute. Such a fact is the lawn, or the close-cropped yard
or park, which appeals so unaffectedly to the taste of
the Western peoples. It appears especially to appeal to
the tastes of the well-to-do classes in those communities
in which the dolicho-blond element predominates in an appreciable
degree. The lawn unquestionably has an element of sensuous
beauty, simply as an object of apperception, and as such
no doubt it appeals pretty directly to the eye of nearly
all races and all classes; but it is, perhaps, more unquestionably
beautiful to the eye of the dolicho-blond than to most
other varieties of men. This higher appreciation of a stretch
of greensward in this ethnic element than in the other
elements of the population, goes along with certain other
features of the dolicho-blond temperament that indicate
that this racial element had once been for a long time
a pastoral people inhabiting a region with a humid climate.
The close-cropped lawn is beautiful in the eyes of a people
whose inherited bent it is to readily find pleasure in
contemplating a well-preserved pasture or grazing land.
For
the aesthetic purpose the lawn is a cow pasture; and in
some cases today — where the expensiveness of the
attendant circumstances bars out any imputation of thrift — the
idyl of the dolicho-blond is rehabilitated in the introduction
of a cow into a lawn or private ground. In such cases the
cow made use of is commonly of an expensive breed. The
vulgar suggestion of thrift, which is nearly inseparable
from the cow, is a standing objection to the decorative
use of this animal. So that in all cases, except where
luxurious surroundings negate this suggestion, the use
of the cow as an object of taste must be avoided. Where
the predilection for some grazing animal to fill out the
suggestion of the pasture is too strong to be suppressed,
the cow's place is often given to some more or less inadequate
substitute, such as deer, antelopes, or some such exotic
beast. These substitutes, although less beautiful to the
pastoral eye of Western man than the cow, are in such cases
preferred because of their superior expensiveness or futility,
and their consequent repute. They are not vulgarly lucrative
either in fact or in suggestion.
Public
parks of course fall in the same category with the lawn;
they too, at their best, are imitations of the pasture.
Such a park is of course best kept by grazing, and the
cattle on the grass are themselves no mean addition to
the beauty of the thing, as need scarcely be insisted on
with anyone who has once seen a well-kept pasture. But
it is worth noting, as an expression of the pecuniary element
in popular taste, that such a method of keeping public
grounds is seldom resorted to. The best that is done by
skilled workmen under the supervision of a trained keeper
is a more or less close imitation of a pasture, but the
result invariably falls somewhat short of the artistic
effect of grazing. But to the average popular apprehension
a herd of cattle so pointedly suggests thrift and usefulness
that their presence in the public pleasure ground would
be intolerably cheap. This method of keeping grounds is
comparatively inexpensive, therefore it is indecorous.
— Thorstein
Veblen
|
|
|
|
Tiger
and Ralph
An
excerpt from the forthcoming book
“Confessions of a Cabana Boy”
Also
posted at Friction Magazine
“Subvert
from within,” Ralph Nader says. “And you,
Tiger, have definitely got the ‘within’ part
covered. Golf and grass go together. Sam Snead, the 1952
Masters Golf Tournament winner, advertised for Toro lawn
mowers. Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer and Bobby Nichols
all hawked lawncare paraphernalia. It’s a ritual
that reassures middle-class American males they can find
their balls in a well-trimmed lawn. Now it’s your
turn, but with a different spin. You can take down a
corporate polluter and be the ultimate adbuster. The
contract is sitting right here on the coffee table. Donde
esta tus huevos? When is the world going to hear ‘This
is Tiger Woods for Chemgro?’”
Tiger is pissed. Ralph won’t relent. That’s when I walk in
with two iced Stolis. Let me explain.
For
the last five years, I’ve been a cabana boy. I
work at “del Nada” which isn’t the
resort's name, it's just what the hired help call it.
The truth is, del Nada doesn’t have a name. To
the clientele it’s simply known as “The Club” — the
world’s most exclusive and confidential playground.
You won’t find “The Club” reviewed
in “Travel” magazine or on Google. Even its
guests are reluctant to talk it. Exclusive with a capitol “E,” del
Nada is where “patrons of pleasure” do whatever
they want in complete utter unapproachable privacy — provided
they could throw down $20,000 a night and get social
clearance.
But
that’s all going to stop here in the summer of
2015. I’m ending my tenure at del Nada and, after
months of soul-searching, I’ve decided to tell
all. The result is what you have in your hands — the
most scandalous book ever written.
But these “confessions” are more than unbearably shocking
exposés or intimate secrets of the rich and famous. They contain
lessons for all of us — about relationships, about life, and about
making a small fortune capitalizing on the idiosyncrasies of the celebrated.
Saddam
Hussein, Bono, Arianna Huffington, Donald Rumsfeld, Ann
Coulter, David Lynch, Martha Stewart and Marlon Brando
(they had adjoining cabins) have all been patrons of
mine. So when I walk in on a bitch fight between the
10-time U.S. Open Champion and the man who brought us “Unsafe
at Any Speed,” I don’t ask questions. Let’s
get back to the action.
Nader,
wrapped only in a towel and staggering hopelessly from
the effects of a birthday spliff I delivered an hour
before, directs me to the wet bar where a bottle of Stolichnaya
vodka has been smashed open. Next to it, an uneaten cake
with the inscription “Happy 80th, Ralph” has
been chopped in half with a nine iron. Apparently someone
is in a serious mood.
“I
never understood your obsession with clubs, but a real
golfer plugs lawn care.” Nader says. “Buicks
and Nikes don’t count.”
Tiger
is ferociously brushing his Colgate kid smile as he paces.
This seems to please Ralph — which is one of the
reasons I campaigned for him way back in 2000. Nader
is uncompromising in an argument. He’s never satisfied
to simply insert the knife: He can only achieve pleasure
while twisting the blade. If you want to know why Democrats
stopped acting like Republicans, just blame Ralph and
Nathan.
“You
wouldn’t be living this upscale lifestyle with
me if it wasn’t for Buick and Nike,” Tiger
says. “What do you want anyway? Every golf course
in the world to be Al Ahmadi?”
For
those unfamiliar with Middle Eastern eccentricities, Al
Ahmadi is the world’s strangest golf course.
It has no grass. A par 70, 6299 yard sand trap located
in Kuwait City, Al Ahmadi requires players to caddy a
small piece of artificial turf. Wherever their ball lies
on the fairway, they transfer it to the patch and swing
away. The course has no greens. Instead, the compressed
dirt around the hole is called “the brown.” I’m
told, through the cabana boy grapevine, that they play
true.
“All
golf courses should be as dry and chemical free as Al
Ahmedi,” Ralph says. “What’s the point
of a lawn 50 yards from the tee when you’re driving
the ball 300 yards. It’s a waste — hundreds
of miles of godawful green turf sucking up water like
a Shop-Vac.
“So
move to Kuwait, weasel lips. And sober up while you’re
at it. I’m not going to be one of your Raiders,” Tiger,
toothpaste foam on the corners of his mouth, rabidly
barks.
Nader growls and throws back a shot. “No kidding. You plugged Nike
and their global sweatshops. Remember? Your mother was Thai. Did you
ever wonder how many of her relatives made slave wages sewing on the
swoosh? It’s time you made up for that. When I ran for President,
there were 46.5 million acres of lawn in America. If you ask me, that’s
about 40 million acres too many. Show some courage. Sign the dotted line.
Pitch lawn care products. Then hold a press conference and blast the
biotech business. End your career with a bang. Sabotage Chemgro."
By
now, I’m sure you’re wondering why Mr. Nader
is focusing his efforts on lawn care. Was he forced to
mow the lawn as a child? Is his octogenarian medication
affecting his mind? Does he believe fairways have something
to do with grassroots politics? Who knows? My job is
to focus on soaking up the vodka spill as ordered.
But
not for long.
Nader
stumbles over to me and offers to help. I plead “no.”
“What
do you think about our discussion?” he asks me.
Off
the record, I was once allergic to grass. I’d puff
up like a blowfish if I inhaled the stuff. My eyes would
swell shut — tears streaming out, Niagra-like.
Now, thanks to the miracle of modern pharmaceuticals,
I can visit a freshly mowed cemetery or spark a fatty
whenever I please.
“I
wouldn’t want to taint the vote,” I say.
“Why
not?” Nader replies. “I know you’re
on my side. As a service worker here at the Club, aren’t
you repulsed by the class divisions inherent in golf?
Of course, grass in and of itself is not evil. It’s
when grass is organized for no just or good purpose that
it becomes insolated . . . insla . . . insla… insidious.”
The
fresh Stoli is already taking its toll.
Unorganized
or not, grass is something I know far too much about.
I owe this to my father — a Professor of Urban
Agriculture at Mexico City University. It takes every
bit of my del Nada training to keep from joining in the
conversation with Tiger and Ralph, letting them know
that Mayans, Aztecs, ancient Persians and pre-colonial
American Indians meditated in natural meadows; or that
a Japanese do-it-yourself gardening book from 1156 AD
featured techniques for sodding with low-growing zoysia
grass; or that in the Middle Ages, grassy fields surrounded
castles to serve a dual purpose — a sneak-attack
buffer-zone and a cow pasture.
Nader,
in the meantime, has more congratulatory things on his
mind.
“Happy
birthday to me.
Happy birthday to me.
Happy birthday dear consumer advocate.
Happy birthday to me.”
Plopping
a party hat on his head, he mumbles a few more improvised
verses of “Happy Birthday” to himself and
climbs back on his soapbox.
“I
bet you didn’t know that the renowned economist,
the world’s earliest cool-hunter, Thorstein
Veblen was the first to observed what I call the
Tyranny of Organized Grass.”
That
does it. I can’t help myself anymore. Dad was a
student of Veblen. I begin quoting from his 1899 classic “The
Theory of the Leisure Class,” bedtime reading in
my family.
“’The
close-cropped lawn is beautiful in the eyes of a people
whose inherited bent it is to readily find pleasure in
contemplating a well-preserved pasture or grazing land,’” I
say.
“Excellent,” Nader
responds. “I’m very impressed. But let me
interpret for you, Tiger. Lawns were beautiful, according
to Veblen, because they remind rich folk of their heritage
as cow owners.”
“Screw
you,” says Tiger.
“Make
me,” says Nader.
Veblen
issues from my mouth again. “’To the average
popular apprehension, a herd of cattle so pointedly suggests
thrift and usefulness that their presence in the public
pleasure ground would be intolerably cheap.’”
Nader
cocks his head and stares, trying to make sense of Veblen
via room service.
“In
other words,” he condescending slurs, “cows
are lower class, especially in a yard.”
And
so it happened that Ralph Nader and a low-life cabana
boy named Nathan Callahan turned an afternoon with the
world’s best golfer into a discussion of lawns
as a division of classes.
“It’s
worth noting, however, that according to Veblen, deer ‘are
not vulgarly lucrative.’”
“In
other words,” Ralph finishes my thought, “deer
are trendy. That’s why antlered replicas and other
useless stone knick-knacks — frogs, bunnies, gnomes
and lawn jockeys are used as lawn ornaments. They’re
the talismans of upper-class cattle-free discretion. ‘It
is the shear impracticality of mowed grass that gives
it stature.’”
“Can’t
you just let it go,” Tiger says. “It’s
your birthday, Mr. Public Citizen. Relax and be happy.”
Ralph,
Stoli in one hand, nine iron in the other, has other
plans.
“No.
No. No. This is the part you’ll love, Tiger. In
1906, the US Golf Association conspired with the US Department
of Agriculture to create a super turf — something
crisp, clean and even. That was the turning point in
lawn politics. That’s where your ridiculous sport
comes in. With the Feds on their side, golfers were ecstatic.
The American public, always easily impressed by white
men swinging clubs, followed enthusiastically along.”
Tiger,
who has worn the toothbrush to a splay of bristles, spits
hard into the sink splashing the mirror with white diluted
paste, but does not reply.
Nader,
surprisingly agile at 80, takes this as a sign to begin
bounding around the room tossing his towel back and forth
like a skirt, his speech in the cadence of a schoolyard
tattletale.
“Tiger.
Tiger. Burning Bright.
In the golf cart of the night.
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy backswing symmetry?
“That’s
why only you, Tiger Woods, can revolutionize the world
of golf. Just sign this advertising contract with Chemgro.
Then blast the corporate polluters with an anti-grass
proclamation. For once in your life, be an activist.”
“Will
you just shut up,” Tiger says.
“Hi,
this is Tiger Woods for Chemgro” Ralph says impressionistically. “As
the world’s most humble golfer, you can take it
from me: There are better things to do with your time
than hitting a ball into a hole.”
With
that, a Nike Tiger Woods signature golf ball sails out
of the bathroom and bounces off the side of Nader’s
head. At first he appears to feel nothing. Then, half
dancing, half reeling, he crosses the room and sits slowly
on the sofa.
“Owwww,” he
says.
Tiger
brings a washcloth with some ice and places the cold
pack lopsidedly on the birthday boy’s imaginary
bruise.
“Nice
shot,” Nader says.
Tiger
smiles, rolls his eyes, signs the dotted line and hands
the Chemgro contract to Nader.
“Happy
Birthday, Ralphy. ‘So long as men can breathe,
or eyes can see, so long lives this, and this gives life
to thee.’”
“Thank
you, Tiger.”
On
his knees, the situation finally under control, the soon-to-be
adbuster applies kisses to Ralph’s receding hairline.
“Thank
YOU, gentlemen,” I say and gently shut the door
behind me.
— Nathan Callahan,
October 13, 2003
LINK
TO THIS ESSAY | READ
MORE ESSAYSi
e
to politics, culture, science, ae
top
of page
|
|
|





|
|